City of Huntington Park v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• establishing that “a construction of a statute which makes some 22 words surplusage” violates a “cardinal rule” of statutory interpretation
• observing that the- California Supreme Court has held, and the United States Supreme Court has confirmed, that California is prohibited “from conditioning a right of action under section 1983 upon compliance with the Tort Claims Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).