Skip to main content
· 7/28/2005

City of Houston v. Cotton

Citations

  • 171 S.W.3d 541
  • 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 441
  • 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 5831
  • 2005 WL 1771189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that appellate court will uphold the trial court’s special-appearance ruling if it can be sustained based on any conclusions of law supported by the evidence
  • holding plaintiff presented no evidence to establish why reasonably prudent employee with her experience would have believed illegal conduct had occurred
  • discounting “second-level hearsay” as providing reasonable basis for good faith belief a violation of law had occurred
  • requiring appellate court to uphold judgment on any correct legal theory supported by findings of fact
  • noting Whistleblower Act plaintiff failed to explain how alleged actions violated cited statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eva M. Guzman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.