City of Houston, Texas v. Department of Housing and Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “a court cannot reach” funds that have reverted to Treasury “in order to award relief” when the appropriation authorizing their expenditure has expired
• explaining that a plaintiff who is at risk of being denied a statutory entitlement by the government has standing to challenge that denial
• explaining that a plaintiff who is at risk of being denied a statutory entitlement by a policy of the defendant has standing to challenge such a policy
• explaining that “[w]hen a plaintiff’s specific claim is moot,” a the terms of the APA, this Court does not properly have jurisdiction over the claim. (See Def. Br. 15-16
• emphasizing that Super Tire 's holding depended on ongoing impact of state law
• explaining that, under D.C. Circuit precedent, “to avoid having its case mooted, a plaintiff must both file its suit before the relevant appropriation lapses and seek a preliminary injunction preventing the agency from disbursing those funds”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).