Skip to main content
· 7/6/2006

City of Hollywood v. Mulligan

Citations

  • 934 So. 2d 1238
  • 31 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 461
  • 2006 Fla. LEXIS 1476
  • 2006 WL 1837930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding whether municipal ordinance is preempted by state law “is a question of law subject to de novo review”
  • \Express preemption of a field by the legislature must be accomplished by clear language stating that intent.\
  • “When possible, ‘we must give full effect to all statutory provisions and construe related statutory provisions in harmony with one another.’”
  • “Express pre-emption requires a specific statement; the pre-emption cannot be made by implication nor by inference.” (internal citation omitted)
  • express pre-emption requires a specific statement; the pre-emption cannot be made by implication nor by inference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.