City of Hidalgo Ambulance Service v. Lira

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the plaintiff’s argument that “the appeal is moot with respect to the second plea to the jurisdiction, because the deficiencies complained about in that plea were addressed in their Third Amended Original Petition,” which had been filed after the second plea to the jurisdiction
• “Use or misuse of information does not amount to use or misuse of tangible property so as to waive governmental immunity under section 101.021(2).”
• “Use or misuse of information does not amount to use or misuse of tangible property so as to waive governmental immunity under section 101.021(2).”
• information is not tangible property
• information is not tangible property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).