City of Hazel Park v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a written employment contract with a city manager was void because it deprived incoming city counsel of power to select and appoint a city manager as provided in the city charter
• contract of employment between outgoing city council and city manager that included generous severance pay provisions held void because it deprived the incoming council of power to select and appoint city manager
• contract of employment between outgoing city council and city manager that included generous severance pay provisions held void because it deprived the incoming council of power to select and ap point city manager
• contract of employment between outgoing city council and city manager that included generous severance pay provisions held void because it deprived the incoming council of power to select and appoint city manager

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).