City of Harrisburg v. Shepler
Citations
- 190 Pa. 374
- 42 A. 893
- 1899 Pa. LEXIS 1034
Syllabus
<p>Municipal law — Divisible contract — Controller's certificate — Performance and acceptance.</p> <p>Where the consideration of a municipal contract is divisible, the cost of one part of the work being chargeable to one item of appropriation and the cost of the other part being chargeable to another item, and the work has been performed in accordance with the terms of the contract, and has been accepted by the city, the controller’s failure to charge the estimated expenditure for the former part of the work to the proper appropriation and to certify the fact upon the contract, does not prevent its taking effect in other particulars when, as to the other part of the expenditure thereunder, the controller did his duty.</p> <p>Municipal contract — Controller's certificate after work done — Affirmance of contract — Equities of property owner.</p> <p>Where a sufficient appropriation has been made to meet the expenditure of a proposed contract, and no act necessary to give the contract full effect remained unperformed except the bare indorsement of the controller’s certificate, while performance of this statutory duty cannot be waived by the city officers, yet, if the certificate be placed on the contract after the completion of the work, where the controller had full authority to certify it before the work began, and the city ratifies it, the city is bound as between the city and the contractor, and the rights of the property owner rise no higher than the rights of the city.</p> <p>A municipal contract for paving, providing for payment partly in cash for city property and by assessments against property of abutting owners, is one “involving the appropriation of money” under the Act of May 23., 1889, P. L. 277, and the validity of the contract is dependent upon the performance of required functions imposed on the controller in the matter certifying the item of appropriation on which it is founded. A certificate failing to indicate the cash appropriation and indicating on
Judges: Fell, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.