CITY OF HAPEVILLE Et Al. v. GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding constitutional challenge to sentencing procedures could not be raised in a motion to correct an illegal sentence
• holding K.S.A. 22-3504\does not cover a claim that a sentence violates a constitutional provision\
• stating Kansas’s version of Rule 35(a) “does not cover a claim that a sentence violates a constitutional provision”
• defining an illegal sentence to include a sentence that does not conform to the applicable statutory provision, either in the character or the term of authorized punishment
• finding a motion to correct an illegal sentence is not the proper procedural vehicle to challenge the constitutionality of a sentence, so court was correct to deny the motion
• Warrior's motion to correct illegal sentence was not the appropriate mechanism to challenge the procedures used to impose her hard 50 life sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).