City of Hampton v. Iowa Civil Rights Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \unless the order to an agency provides otherwise a remand is general and the agency is free to address the claim anew\
• holding discharge in retaliation for filing sex discrimination claim in violation of Iowa law is subject to burden-shifting analysis
• applying a burdén-shift-ing analysis in retaliatory discharge cases to determine the inferences from circumstantial evidence
• applying burden-shifting analysis to retaliatory discharge claim and outlining elements as: “(1) involvement in statutorily protected activity, (2) adverse employment action, and (3) a causal connection between the two”
• describing burden-shifting analysis in retaliatory discharge claim, for filing civil rights complaint
• a causal connection, showing that protected activity was a significant factor in the employer’s motivation, is one element of a prima facie case of retaliation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).