City of Gainesville v. Gilliland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument that section 516.090 did not apply because the land had never been subjected to a public use
• rejecting argument that section 516.090 did not apply because the land had never been subjected to a public use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).