City of Franklin v. Lacey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “By virtue of the settlement agreement, [plaintiff] effectively agreed to carve out conduct predating the 2009 EEOC complaint from any future claim she might assert.”
• allegations of retaliation that post-date the plaintiff’s EEOC charge were exhausted because they are part of the same “campaign” of retaliatory harassment
• “Hopkins’ teaching awards for student performance on spelling bees, standardized tests, and school attendance do not negate the Board’s findings of unprofessional conduct and verbal abuse.”
• “Arguments not raised in an opening brief are deemed forfeited.”
• suspension “plainly” qualified as adverse action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).