City of Forrest City v. Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that once the two statutory findings are made, “no further explanation” is required
• reasoning that this Court’s “proper role is merely to evaluate the sufficiency of the evidence . . . . [T]o do[] otherwise would be to invade the province of fact finding best occupied by our trial courts”
• “[T]he General Assembly intended the task of considering and making findings regarding the two factors of KRS 439.3106(1) to serve as the analytical precursor to a trial court’s ultimate decision[] whether revocation or a lesser sanction is appropriate.”
• probationer attempted to alter the results of a drug screen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).