City of Fayetteville v. Rose

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [S]tate must present evidence of present deprivation, not past or potential future deprivation.”
• “The [S]tate must present evidence of present deprivation, not past or potential future deprivation.”
• “Indeed, a trial court's oral pronouncements are not binding because, while they may provide insight on the intent of the subsequent written judgment, any discrepancy between the written judgment and oral pronouncements is resolved in favor of the written judgment.”
• “Indeed, a trial court’s oral pronouncements are not binding because, while they may provide insight on the intent of the subsequent written judgment, any discrepancy between the written judgment and oral pronouncements is resolved in favor of the written judgment.”
• “a trial court’s oral pronouncements are not binding because, while they may provide insight on the intent of the subsequent written judgment, any 17 discrepancy between the written judgment and oral pronouncements is resolved in favor of the written judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).