City of Everett v. Weborg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pre-1984 RCW 8.25.070's plain language indicates that a condemnee must comply with subsection (3)'s time requirements despite a right to appeal the public use and necessity order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Costich
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-10-07· cited 128×
• Daviscourt v. Peistrup
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-04-24· cited 31×
• Port of Edmonds v. Northwest Fur Breeders Cooperative, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-10-07· cited 18×
• State ex rel. State Convention & Trade Center v. Allerdice
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-05· cited 6×
• STATE EX REL. CONVENTION CTR. v. Allerdice
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-05· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Roth
  Washington Supreme Court· 1971-01-07· cited 81×
• In Re Petition of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-12-24· cited 57×
• State Ex Rel. Hagan v. Chinook Hotel, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1965-02-04· cited 50×
• Vannoy v. Pacific Power & Light Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-03-15· cited 40×
• London v. City of Seattle
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-05-29· cited 18×
• In Re Puget Sound Power & Light Co.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-03-16· cited 11×
• State v. Bergh
  Washington Supreme Court· 1964-06-18· cited 3×