City of Emeryville v. The Sherwin-Williams Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appellant waived claim “[b]y failing to address the issue in its opening brief except in a footnote”
• noting that CERCLA was designed to ensure, inter alia, “that settlements are encouraged through specified contribution protection”
• noting that CERCLA was designed to ensure, inter alia, “that settlements are encouraged through specified contribution protection”
• noting that a would-be intervenor cannot “rely on an interest that is wholly remote and speculative”
• noting that CERCLA was designed to ensure, inter alia, “that settlements are encouraged through specified contribution protection”
• explaining that where a party does not challenge a district court’s ruling as to an issue in its opening brief, “that issue is not before us on appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).