City of Edmonds v. Mauser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that First Amendment rights of an off-duty officer communicating about concealed weapons were sufficiently established by precedent regarding off-duty officer’s entertainment performances
• concluding that claim not properly raised in appellant's opening brief is deemed abandoned
• holding that granting a 12(b)(6) motion is appropriate where “it appears certain that the plaintiff cannot prove any set of facts in support of his claim entitling him to relief’
• holding that for a retaliation claim to be actionable under Title VII, the employee must allege a “decrease in compensation, job title, level of responsibility, or opportunity for promotion”
• noting that police officer's speech, relating to proper use and manner of handling concealed weapons, affected public safety and involved matters of public concern
• noting that police officer’s speech, relating to proper use and manner of handling concealed weapons, affected public safety and involved matters of public concern

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).