City of East St. Louis v. Netflix, Inc.

Oral argument

• Argued

  42 min recording
  Listen

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a legislature is\never require[d] ... to articulate its reasons for enacting a statute\
• holding that government actions will be found rational “if there is any rea sonably conceivable state of facts” that could support it
• recognizing that \a legislative choice is not subject to courtroom factfinding and may be based on rational speculation unsupported by evidence or empirical data\
• holding that a legislature is“never require[d] ... to articulate its reasons for enacting a statute”
• holding that equal protection is not violated “if there is any reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis” for the disparate treatment
• holding that rational basis review involves looking at whether “there is any reasonably conceivable state of facts that could provide a rational basis for the classification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).