City of East Peoria v. Palmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with the circuit court that the officer lacked reasonable, articulable suspicion because the circuit court found the officer to be “not credible” and the dashboard camera video did not provide “conclusive proof’ of a violation
• agreeing with the circuit court that the officer lacked 11 reasonable, articulable suspicion because the circuit court found the officer to be “not 12 credible” and the dashboard camera video did not provide “conclusive proof” of a 13 violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).