Skip to main content
· 4/15/2005

City of Dodge City v. Ingram

Citations

  • 109 P.3d 1272
  • 33 Kan. App. 2d 829
  • 2005 Kan. App. LEXIS 377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing Ingram’s failure on the alphabet test, the walk-and-tum test, and the one-legged balance test
  • discussing defendant’s failure on “alphabet test,” the “walk-and-tum test,” and the “one-leg-balance test”
  • finding statement that jury is the “ ‘conscience of the community’ ” improper
  • finding statement that jury is the 'conscience of the community' improper
  • prosecutors comments that defense “‘simply arguing smoke and mirrors’” and “‘[g] rasping at straws’” not improper
  • prosecutor's comments that defense \'simply arguing smoke and mirrors'\ and \'[g]rasping at straws'\ not improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greene, Green, Caplinger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.