· 4/15/2005
City of Dodge City v. Ingram
Citations
- 109 P.3d 1272
- 33 Kan. App. 2d 829
- 2005 Kan. App. LEXIS 377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing Ingram’s failure on the alphabet test, the walk-and-tum test, and the one-legged balance test
- discussing defendant’s failure on “alphabet test,” the “walk-and-tum test,” and the “one-leg-balance test”
- finding statement that jury is the “ ‘conscience of the community’ ” improper
- finding statement that jury is the 'conscience of the community' improper
- prosecutors comments that defense “‘simply arguing smoke and mirrors’” and “‘[g] rasping at straws’” not improper
- prosecutor's comments that defense \'simply arguing smoke and mirrors'\ and \'[g]rasping at straws'\ not improper
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greene, Green, Caplinger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.