· 12/16/1988
City of Dallas v. Arnett
Citations
- 762 S.W.2d 942
- 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 3376
- 1988 WL 146874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that conflicting testimony raised fact issue; fact finder was not obliged to accept one expert’s testimony over the other
- holding that conflicting testimony raised fact issue; fact finder was not obliged to accept one expert's testimony over the other
- upholding award that was within range of testimony
- upholding award that was within range of testimony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stephens, Stewart, Rowe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.