Skip to main content
· 12/16/1988

City of Dallas v. Arnett

Citations

  • 762 S.W.2d 942
  • 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 3376
  • 1988 WL 146874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that conflicting testimony raised fact issue; fact finder was not obliged to accept one expert’s testimony over the other
  • holding that conflicting testimony raised fact issue; fact finder was not obliged to accept one expert's testimony over the other
  • upholding award that was within range of testimony
  • upholding award that was within range of testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens, Stewart, Rowe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.