City of Dallas, Tex. v. Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an environmental impact statement was not required when the federal action “[did] not effect a change in the use or character of land or in the physical environment”
• holding that an environmental impact statement was not required when the federal action “[did] not effect a change in the use or character of land or in the physical environment”
• finding that a range of alternatives was reasonable “especially given that [the agency] concluded that the project had no significant environmental impact” (emphasis added)
• \Properly analyzing the risks of an action requires an agency to use updated information or data ....\
• “Properly analyzing the risks of an action requires an agency to use updated information or data . . . .”
• “The EA in this case . . . analyzed the effects of three different alternatives (no action, a larger refuge, and a smaller refuge) . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).