City of Covington v. South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Plaintiffs fail to satisfy their burden of identifying an in-state interest that is benefitted or an out-of-state competitor that is harmed\
• “Traffic spillover and substitution effects are appropriate considerations in determining whether a functional relationship exists.”
• “[G]iven the substantial evidence that traffic flow on the TBTA bridges and tunnels would suffer significantly without the MTA’s mass transit and commuter railway services, it is not unfair for the MTA to allocate TBTA surpluses to support these functionally related facilities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).