City of Covington v. Casey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requirement to redact parts of a proposal 24 was material because it “served a substantive purpose”
• holding that the requirement to redact parts of a proposal was material because it “served a substantive purpose”
• finding that FAR § 14.405’s requirement for agencies to waive minor informalities is not applicable to a procurement governed by FAR Part 12 and 15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).