City of Covington v. APB Whiting, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that \a fiduciary is not obli- gated to seek out employees to ensure that they understand the plan’s provisions\
• describing SPD as a document that “specifically and simply describes the plan’s provisions,” details “the contents of the plan,” and “explains the plan and its terms”
• “ERISA imposes a duty upon fiduciaries to respond promptly and adequately to employee-initiated inquiries regarding the plan or any of its terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).