City of Cornelius v. Dept. of Land Conservation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that institution needs to submit “undisputed facts ” showing that “relevant officials” “considered alternative means, their feasibility, [and] cost and effect on the academic program”
• refusing to defer when institution presented no evidence regarding “who took part in the decision” and finding “simple conclusory averment” of head of institution insufficient to support deferential standard of review
• “[Ewing] was a context where no federal statutory obligation impinged on the academic administrators; their freedom to make genuine academic decisions was untrammeled.”
• “[Ewing] was a context where no federal statutory obligation impinged on the academic administrators; their freedom to make genuine academic decisions was untrammeled.”
• “[Ewing] was a context where no federal statutory obligation impinged on the academic administrators; their freedom to make genuine academic decisions was untrammeled.”
• where facts are undisputed, deference to institutional decision that plaintiff was unable to participate effectively in program is appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).