City of Columbus v. Barngrover

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the absence of a specific limitation on the city attorney’s authority, the trial court did not err in charging the jury that the city was bound by the conduct of the city attorney
• \the exercise of dominion or control over the property causing the harm is sufficient to establish nuisance liability\
• “the exercise of dominion or control over the property causing the harm is sufficient to establish nuisance liability”
• claim against consolidated government was adequately presented under OCGA § 36-11-1 by way of letter to “the City,” which apparently was directed to the director of public services
• claim against consolidated government was adequately presented under OCGA § 36-11-1 by way of letter to “the City,” which apparently was directed to the director of public services
• trial court did not err in charging the jury that the city was bound by the conduct of its attorney in the absence of a specific limitation on the city attorney’s authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).