City of Columbia v. C.F.W. Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “[b]ecause [the witness] qualified as an expert, it was error to prevent her from answering merely because it embraced the ultimate issue”
• explaining that “if the plaintiff’s case has not been made out by a preponderance of the evidence, a judgment may be rendered against the plaintiff on the merits”
• \The evidence of intent is to be found in the language used by the parties ... considered in the light of their respective interests and other relevant circumstances ... and in the practical construction given to it by the parties....\
• “The evidence of intent is to be found in the language used by the parties . . . considered in the light of their respective interests and other relevant circumstances . . . and in the practical construction given to it by the parties . . . .”
• “The evidence of intent is to be found in the language used by the parties . . . considered in the light of their respective interests and other relevant circumstances . . . and in the practical construction given to it by the parties . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).