City of Columbia City Ex Rel. Municipally-Owned Electric Utility v. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[a] Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 45A03-1609-MI-2052 | July 28, 2017 Page 16 of 24 legal conclusion is where an expert states his opinion as to how the case should be decided”
• \A plain reading of the Act leads to the conclusion that a territorial realignment should take place only after significant Commission serutiny. There exists no explicit or implicit statutory preference in the Act for municipally owned utility service in municipally owned territory\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).