City of Coatesville v. Jarvis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to find waiver despite the appellant's nine-page, 36-paragraph 1925(b) statement, which failed to clearly identify the precise issues complained of on appeal, because trial court addressed the two issues it believed appellant tried to raise
• “[B]ecause the trial court has provided such a thorough opinion in which it addresses the issue raised by the City, we cannot say that our appellate review has been impeded.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).