City of Cleveland v. Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that this standard applies at summary judgment when a court considers a final agency action under the APA
• noting that the general rule is that a party unsuccessfully seeking to intervene may appeal only from the order denying intervention
• stating the City asserted its own interests and not that of the non-party whose role was to carry out the duties of the City
• applying constitutional standing principles applicable to federal courts “recogniz[ing] the general rule prohibiting a party who unsuccessfully filed a motion to intervene from appealing anything but the order denying intervention”
• “Agency action is ‘not in accor- dance with the law’ when it is in conflict with the language of the statute . . . .”
• “Agency action is ‘not in accordance with the law’ when it is in conflict with the language of the statute relied upon by the agency.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).