Skip to main content
· 7/19/1995

City of Cleveland, Ohio v. City of Brook Park, Ohio

Citations

  • 893 F. Supp. 742
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10160
  • 1995 WL 432341

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Ninth Circuit’s “view of the scope of the Aviation Act is simply broader than that implied in any reasonable reading of the statute.”
  • “[Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena’s ] view of the scope of the Aviation Act is simply broader than that implied in any reasonable reading of the statute”
  • “The Federal Aviation Act, the Noise Control Act, and the AAIA contain no express preemption of local land use ordinances.”
  • city ordinance established procedures for obtaining conditional use permit for new airport construction
  • “The Federal Aviation Act does not occupy the field of land use regulations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ann Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.