City of Chicago v. Sansum
Citations
- 87 Ill. 182
Syllabus
<p>1. Mandamus—to compel city to pay judgment. Where a judgment is recovered against a city, a duty rests upon it to pay the same, which -may be enforced by mandamus, at the suit of an assignee of the judgment.</p> <p>2. Practice—time to object for want of demand in proceeding for mandamus. Where no objection is taken in the court below to a want of a previous demand for the payment of money sought to be enforced by mandamus against a city, it can not be urged in this court, even if it is material.</p> <p>3. Former adjudication. A recovery of judgment in a case where payments are pleaded and urged on the trial, is conclusive between the parties, and the same defense can not.be set up and urged a second time on an application for a mandamus to enforce payment of the judgment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- pp. 28, 29 of 177 Ind., pp. 329, 330 of 96 N. E.
- pp. 28, 29 of 177 Ind., pp. 329, 330 of 96 N.E.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scholfield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.