Skip to main content
· 9/15/1877

City of Chicago v. Sansum

Citations

  • 87 Ill. 182

Syllabus

<p>1. Mandamus—to compel city to pay judgment. Where a judgment is recovered against a city, a duty rests upon it to pay the same, which -may be enforced by mandamus, at the suit of an assignee of the judgment.</p> <p>2. Practice—time to object for want of demand in proceeding for mandamus. Where no objection is taken in the court below to a want of a previous demand for the payment of money sought to be enforced by mandamus against a city, it can not be urged in this court, even if it is material.</p> <p>3. Former adjudication. A recovery of judgment in a case where payments are pleaded and urged on the trial, is conclusive between the parties, and the same defense can not.be set up and urged a second time on an application for a mandamus to enforce payment of the judgment.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pp. 28, 29 of 177 Ind., pp. 329, 330 of 96 N. E.
  • pp. 28, 29 of 177 Ind., pp. 329, 330 of 96 N.E.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scholfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.