City of Chicago v. Martin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Ohio law requiring fees for inmate medical visits did not violate the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendments
• holding that Eighth Amendment claim based on inmates’ allegation “that they were required to pay for medication,” but not denied it, is “indisputably meritless”
• concluding that inmates had no viable due process claim stemming from the deduction of a medical copayment fee from their trust accounts
• holding policy requirement payment for medical services, where funds are available, does not violate an inmate’s constitutional rights
• holding policy requirement of payment for medical services, where funds are available, does not violate an inmate’s constitutional rights
• holding policy requiring payment for medical services, where funds are available, does not violate an inmate’s constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).