City of Chicago v. Kelly
Citations
- 69 Ill. 475
Syllabus
<p>1. Damages—vindictive—as against municipal corporation. Municipal corporations are not liable to vindictive or exemplary damages for personal injuries growing out of mere neglect to keep a sidewalk in a safe condition. In order to justify such damages, the negligence of the authorities must be so gross as to be wilful.</p> <p>2. Same—excessive—personal injury. Where the plaintiff received a fall from a defect in the sidewalk of a city, inflicting an injury in her foot., but- not so serious but that she was able to walk the next day but one after, and a miscarriage also resulted shortly afterwards from the effect of the fall, but it did not appear that she received any permanent injury to her person or health, it was held, that a verdict giving her §4050 was so excessive that a new trial should have been awarded.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- divorce decree barred former husband’s guardian from maintaining an action to set aside an antenuptial contract
- pp. 327, 328 of 150 Ind., p. 71 of 50 N. E.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.