Skip to main content
· 12/5/1950

City of Chicago v. Carson

Citations

  • 342 Ill. App. 203
  • 96 N.E.2d 103
  • 1950 Ill. App. LEXIS 474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • employee’s submission of invention developed within scope of employment for patent protection “warranted] the equitable relief and protection” sought by plaintiff, and was a misappropriation of its trade secret.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.