City of Chicago v. Anthony

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in an eminent domain proceeding “it is eminent domain law which controls the admissibility of evidence for its truth”
• when determining if information is reliable, courts ask whether “the underlying facts or data upon which [the expert] seeks to base an opinion are of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field”
• when determining if information is reliable, court ask whether “the underlying facts or data upon which [the expert] seeks to base an opinion are of a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field”
• “If another rule of law applicable to the case excludes the information sought to be relied upon by the expert, the information may not be permitted to come before the jury under the guise of a basis for the opinion of the expert.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).