City of Charlotte v. Helms

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the court lacked jurisdiction over the contractor’s claim for “costs resulting from logging of mismarked timber” because it was “not reduced to a specific amount”
• allowing the presentment of an increased claim “as the result of newly discovered or newly developed evidence.”
• finding that the Claims Court had no jurisdiction over a new claim for damages related to mismarked Forest Service timber, when the claim presented to the contracting officer was only for damages related to faulty estimates of the amount and type of timber available for harvest
• government has no duty to volunteer information where contract itself contemplates the means by which such information may be obtained, such as site inspection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).