Skip to main content
· 2/21/2006

City of Bridgeport v. Plan & Zoning Commission

Citations

  • 890 A.2d 540
  • 277 Conn. 268
  • 2006 Conn. LEXIS 47

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • whether party complied with certain statutory notice requirements was mixed ques- tion of fact and law subject to plenary review when facts were undisputed and dispute concerned ‘‘the trial court’s application of [the statute] to those facts’’
  • whether party complied with statutory notice requirements under General Statutes § 8-3 (a) was mixed question of fact and law subject to plenary review when facts were undisputed and dispute con- cerned ‘‘the trial court’s application of § 8-3 (a) to those facts’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Borden, Norcott, Palmer, Vertefeuille

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.