City of Brentwood v. Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that courts “must construe the complaint liberally in favor of the plaintiff by ... giving the plaintiff the benefit of all the inferences that can be reasonably drawn from the pleaded facts”
• holding that courts “must construe the complaint liberally in favor of the plaintiff by . . . giving the plaintiff the benefit of all the inferences that can be reasonably drawn from the pleaded facts”
• “The Court of Appeals may affirm a judgment on different grounds than those relied on by the trial court when the trial court reached the correct result.”
• “The Court of Appeals may affirm a judgment on different grounds than those relied on by the trial court when the trial court reached the correct result.”
• “The Court of -13- Appeals may affirm a judgment on different grounds than those relied on by the trial court when the trial court reached the correct result.”
• “The Court of Appeals may affirm a judgment on different grounds than those relied on by the trial court when the trial court reached the correct result.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).