Skip to main content
· 9/13/2004

City of Black Hawk v. City of Central

Citations

  • 97 P.3d 951
  • 2004 WL 2029725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the discrepancy between the location listed in an initial application and the intended site of a dam enlargement was immaterial and thus no amendment or republication of the resume notice was required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.