City of Billings v. Spear

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a protestor did not waive its right to challenge an amendment to a solicitation when it was not aware of the terms of the amendment
• stating that Blue & Gold Fleet “has been consistently interpreted as standing for the proposition that ‘[t]he proper time to challenge the provisions of a prospectus is before bids are required to be submitted’ ” (quoting Frazier v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. 148, 177 (2007))
• applying “a standard for the showing of prejudice that lies between Weeks Marine [v. United States ], 79 Fed.Cl. [22,] 35 [ (2007), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 575 F.3d 1352 (Fed.Cir.2009

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).