City of Bethel v. Peters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plain error review applied when party did not object to court’s failure to take corrective action in response to allegedly improper closing arguments
• holding that the superior court should have withheld the question of whether a plaintiff had suffered severe disfigurement only if no reasonable juror could find that the plaintiff suffered severe disfigurement
• holding that the superior court should have withheld the question of whether a plaintiff had suffered severe disfigurement only if no reasonable juror could find that the plaintiff suffered severe disfigurement
• holding that post-incident report, with “corrective action” section redacted, was admissible
• affirming superior court's admission of a report with inadmissible sections redacted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).