Skip to main content
· 2/25/1929

City of Baton Rouge v. Baton Rouge Waterworks Co.

Citations

  • 30 F.2d 895
  • 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he mere fact that the parties agree that th 19 court should exercise continuing jurisdiction is not binding on th 20 court.”
  • “It is true that only the issuing court can enforce its own injunction by 22 means of contempt proceedings.”
  • “[I]f the district court explicitly retains jurisdiction over the settlement agreement, or incorporates the terms of the agreement in its dismissal order (as is common in class action settlements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grubb

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.