City of Bardstown v. Hurst

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the plaintiff, as the plaintiff in Savin, “point[ed] to specific publications and allege[d] the national, and even global, renown of the marks”
• “Since Plaintiff has met the more rigorous standard fór famé under the Lanham Act, this discussion focuses on dilution by blurring.”
• “The threshold finding of distinctiveness ... is a necessary, but not sufficient, element of fame [under the FTDA].” (first alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• A party can “properly attach U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filings to a motion to dismiss”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).