· 2/6/1995
City of Aurora v. Acosta
Citations
- 892 P.2d 264
- 19 Brief Times Rptr. 173
- 1995 Colo. LEXIS 19
- 1995 WL 46452
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- approving a ballot issue, challenged on different grounds, that does not contain any time limitation
- when interpreting a constitutional provision, courts must consider the object to be accomplished and the mischief to be avoided by the provision
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mullarkey, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.