Skip to main content
· 2/6/1995

City of Aurora v. Acosta

Citations

  • 892 P.2d 264
  • 19 Brief Times Rptr. 173
  • 1995 Colo. LEXIS 19
  • 1995 WL 46452

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • approving a ballot issue, challenged on different grounds, that does not contain any time limitation
  • when interpreting a constitutional provision, courts must consider the object to be accomplished and the mischief to be avoided by the provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mullarkey, Scott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.