Skip to main content
· 10/20/1998

Federal Case

Citations

  • 154 F.3d 1025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the Act preempted a local environmental-permitting requirement that sought to prevent a railroad from pursuing various rail improvement projects
  • rejecting a plaintiff’s reliance on legislative history of a federal statute, rather than “the language of the statute itself,” in determining whether a state law was expressly preempted
  • ICCTA preempts state and local environmental review laws as applied to reopening of rail line
  • ICCTA preempts state and local environmental review laws as applied to reopening of rail line
  • seeming to apply a broader preemption rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.