City of Atlanta v. Landmark Environmental Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jury verdict could not be upheld “[w]ithout the specifics of the jury’s calculations,” and that prevailing party’s attempt to calculate the “market value of the business” were “mere speculation and wholly unsupported by any evidence”
• holding that jury award could not be affirmed when justifications on appeal were “mere speculation and wholly unsupported by any evidence that . . . provides a reliable basis for calculating the market value”
• pre-judgment interest is not a component of the just and adequate compensation due a condemnee under the Georgia Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).