City of Atlanta v. Clifford Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a petitioner lacked competitor standing where it did not allege any financial injury
• noting that, in “garden variety competitor standing cases” the “chain of causation” is “firmly rooted in the basic law of economics” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “basic law[s] of economics” hold that increased competition leads to actual injury (quotation omitted)
• competitor standing is “premised on the petitioner’s status as a direct and current competitor whose bottom line may be adversely affected by the challenged government action”
• competitor standing is “premised on the petitioner’s status as a direct and current competitor whose bottom line may be adversely affected by the challenged government action”
• radio-station licensee did not have standing to challenge FCC's renewal of another firm's license for a station that did not itself compete with the challenger, where only possible future competition was shown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).