City of Atlanta v. Chambers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• focusing on whether character of municipal function is primarily a source of revenue or is being used primarily for the benefit of the public regardless of incidental generation of revenues
• focusing on whether character of municipal function is primarily a source of revenue or is being used primarily for the benefit of the public regardless of incidental generation of revenues
• trial court correctly granted summary judgment on negligent retention and negligent entrustment claims because “garbage collection by the City is a governmental function, for the negligent performance of which the City would be immune from liability”
• companion cases concerning a plaintiff’s direct appeal from the grant of summary judgment, as well 3 Given the foregoing, West was not authorized to file a direct appeal from the November 30, 2012 Order pursuant to OCGA § 9-11-56 (h
• trial court correctly granted summary judgment on negligent retention and negligent entrustment 10 (751 SE2d 172) (2013) (demolition of a house claimed to be a nuisance was a government function). See also Mayor and Aldermen of City of Savannah v. Jones, 149 Ga. 139, 139 (99 SE 294) (1919

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).