City of Ashland v. City of Catlettsburg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Nickelodeon I and stating that its “conclusion that '[personally identifiable information] is information which must, without more, itself link an actual person to actual video materials' is flawed”
• analyzing Section 2710(b)(2)(D)’s exception to the general prohibition on the disclosure of PII, pursuant to which such disclosures are permissible insofar as they consist “solely of the names and addresses of consumers,” among other requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).